Re: [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2?

[Simon Morlat]

Too bad...
Seems difficult to solve this problem that way.
I don't think the gcc version can play a role.
Do you think it can be possible for me log on your machine with ssh and try by 
myself ? I'd like to modify the code to add some printouts.
Otherwise I'll send you modified versions and we can iterate together.

Simon

Le samedi 27 juin 2009 14:14:38, Bent a écrit :
> Simon,
>
> I have recompiled Linphone with these lines:
> make clean
> LDFLAGS=-g  make
> But the result is almost the same; there are slight differences in the
> back-trace and an extra line:
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?).
>
> I have been using a self-compiled version of Linphone all the time. I
> checked the Makefile and it has these two lines (not at the same
> spot):
> CFLAGS = -g -O2
> LDFLAGS =
> as you had mentioned. This made me try the exercise with the LDFLAGS=
>
> Could it be something with the version of gcc? I seem to remember from
> the Ekiga list that the gcc version *could* play a role. My gcc is
> 4.3.2 and the advice on the Ekiga list was to use either 4.4 or 4.2
> for reasons I can't remember.
>
> So: what do I best do now?
>
> Another observation, which I should have included in the very first
> post: When I preload the compatibility library, it doesn't matter
> which version of V4L I choose, both work equally well. The V4L2
> version should fail, shouldn't it?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Bent