[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Liberty-eiffel Digest, Vol 53, Issue 5
From: |
Raphael Mack |
Subject: |
Re: Liberty-eiffel Digest, Vol 53, Issue 5 |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:15:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
DOS? - it was before me being interested in computers (beside an old
Schneider CPC64 with a cassette tape drive) so I am not competent to
answer the question. But I can tell that I wouldn't miss it.
Regards,
Rapha
Am Montag, dem 14.02.2022 um 13:13 +0100 schrieb Hans Zwakenberg:
> yes, we want to make it as simple as possible, but not any
> simpler... :)
>
> I'll take steps towards c-runtime simplification. For now, I'm not
> throwing out DOS just yet, as many Intel-based controller boards may
> be using a derivative of DOS. About keeping DOS for now, I'd
> appreciate feedback from our user-base and/or readership.
>
> cheers
> Hans
>
>
> > liberty-eiffel-request@gnu.org hat am 12.02.2022 18:00 geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > Send Liberty-eiffel mailing list submissions to
> > liberty-eiffel@gnu.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/liberty-eiffel
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > liberty-eiffel-request@gnu.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > liberty-eiffel-owner@gnu.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Liberty-eiffel digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: C-compiler support? (Raphael Mack)
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:17:18 +0100
> > From: Raphael Mack <ramack@raphael-mack.de>
> > To: liberty-eiffel@gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: C-compiler support?
> > Message-ID:
> > <c13fdac2e6131a224fba6b4fad5f94c6a69aef31.camel@raphael-mack.de
> > >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> >
> > A system is perfect if you can't remove anything from it :-)
> >
> > Not always but in this case I would go for removing everything that
> > simplifies debugging, our life, whatever, as long as nobody is
> > using
> > it.
> >
> > After 3 Days now I would say we can safely remove everything expect
> > x86
> > (32 and 64 bit variants) and PPC.
> >
> > Thanks for taking care Hans,
> > Rapha
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 09.02.2022 um 15:23 +0530 schrieb Krishna:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022, 14:48 Hans Zwakenberg,
> > > <hz@ocean-consulting.de>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Group,
> > > >
> > > > do we really continue to support CRAY, RS6000, PowerPC,
> > > > HP9000,
> > > > VAX, SPARC, MC68000, NS32000, etc.?
> > > >
> > > > The C-runtime (esp. base.h and base.c) could be so much
> > > > simpler
> > > > and easier to validate when support for all of the above legacy
> > > > systems were dropped? Is there any merit in keeping that old
> > > > stuff?
> > >
> > > Maybe just keep PowerPC?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > --krishna
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > > Hans
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Digest Footer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Liberty-eiffel mailing list
> > Liberty-eiffel@gnu.org
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/liberty-eiffel
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > End of Liberty-eiffel Digest, Vol 53, Issue 5
> > *********************************************
>