help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: problem with residue and repeated complex roots


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: problem with residue and repeated complex roots
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:58:39 -0500

ok, I checked my local Octave 2.9.17 (which I have some trouble with), and I checked Matlab 7.3

-------------------------------------
octave:2> n = 1;
octave:3> d = [1 8 42 104 169];
octave:4> roots(d)
ans =

  -2.0000 + 3.0000i
  -2.0000 - 3.0000i
  -2.0000 + 3.0000i
  -2.0000 - 3.0000i

octave:5> [a b c] = residue(n,d)
a =

  3.9416e-18 - 9.2593e-03i
  -2.7778e-02 - 5.6372e-10i
  -2.3130e-18 + 9.2593e-03i
  -2.7778e-02 + 5.6372e-10i

b =

  -2.0000 + 3.0000i
  -2.0000 + 3.0000i
  -2.0000 - 3.0000i
  -2.0000 - 3.0000i

c = [](0x0)
-------------------------------------

For Matlab 7.3 on Mac OSX I get (essentially) the same result.

-------------------------------------
n = 1;
>> d = [1 8 42 104 169];
>> roots(d)

ans =

 -2.000000031975913 + 3.000000067504366i
 -2.000000031975913 - 3.000000067504366i
 -1.999999968024083 + 2.999999932495634i
 -1.999999968024083 - 2.999999932495634i

>> [a,b,c] = residue(n,d)

a =

 -0.000000000000000 - 0.009259259259259i
 -0.027777777777778 + 0.000000000000000i
 -0.000000000000000 + 0.009259259259259i
 -0.027777777777778 - 0.000000000000000i


b =

 -1.999999999999998 + 3.000000000000000i
 -1.999999999999998 + 3.000000000000000i
 -1.999999999999998 - 3.000000000000000i
 -1.999999999999998 - 3.000000000000000i


c =

     []
-------------------------------------

My results agree with your Octave results, but not with your Matlab. What version of Matlab are you using.

Ben

p.s. sorry for not looking at the detail earlier


On Nov 27, 2007, at 8:42 PM, Doug Stewart wrote:


I downloaded from

http://velveeta.che.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/octave/ scripts/polynomial/residue.m?rev=1.35;content-type=text%2Fplain

and it does use mpoles.m

but I still get

> [a b c]=residue(n,d)

ver = 1.35

a =

-9.3613e-018 - 9.2593e-003i

-2.7778e-002 - 5.3894e-010i

2.3130e-018 + 9.2593e-003i

-2.7778e-002 + 5.3894e-010i

b =

-2.0000 + 3.0000i

-2.0000 + 3.0000i

-2.0000 - 3.0000i

-2.0000 - 3.0000i

c = [](0x0)

To prove that I was using the new file and not an older file I added a line to print out the ver. number.


Please test this on your machine.


Doug Stewart



Doug Stewart wrote:
Thanks
Doug

Ben Abbott wrote:

Doug,

This problem was addressed with a change that made it into 2.9.16. If you check the cvs you can replace your residue.m with the one there. You'll need mpoles.m as well.

I should also mention that another bug/feature was fixed just yesterday.

Ben

On Nov 27, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Doug Stewart wrote:


I am running qtoctave on windows XP octave version 2.9.15
residue doesn't give the correct answer for repeated complex roots

her is Matlab's result

» n
n =
     1
» d
d =
     1     8    42   104   169
» roots(d)
ans =
  -2.0000+ 3.0000i
  -2.0000- 3.0000i
  -2.0000+ 3.0000i
  -2.0000- 3.0000i
» [a b c]=residue(n,d)
a =
  1.0e+005 *
   1.2662+ 1.8232i
   1.2662- 1.8232i
  -1.2662- 1.8232i
  -1.2662+ 1.8232i
b =
  -2.0000+ 3.0000i
  -2.0000- 3.0000i
  -2.0000+ 3.0000i
  -2.0000- 3.0000i
c =
     []

and qtoctave's results


n

n = 1


d

d =

1 8 42 104 169


roots(d)

ans =

-2.0000 + 3.0000i

-2.0000 - 3.0000i

-2.0000 + 3.0000i

-2.0000 - 3.0000i


[a b c]=residue(n,d)

a =

-9.3613e-018 - 9.2593e-003i

-2.7778e-002 - 5.3894e-010i

2.3130e-018 + 9.2593e-003i

-2.7778e-002 + 5.3894e-010i

b =

-2.0000 + 3.0000i

-2.0000 + 3.0000i

-2.0000 - 3.0000i

-2.0000 - 3.0000i

c = [](0x0)



I haven't looked into why this is happening yet.

Doug Stewart

_______________________________________________
Help-octave mailing list
address@hidden
https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave

_______________________________________________
Help-octave mailing list
address@hidden
https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]