[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eigs and Octave.app
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: eigs and Octave.app |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:57:14 +0100 |
Am Montag, den 12.11.2007, 19:24 +0100 schrieb David Bateman:
> Note ARPACK is a fedora package for example as it has been cleared by
> their lawyers for distribution in Fedora..
Are you sure? RiceBSD.doc is listed under "not okay" at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
> > Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > modification, are permitted provided that the foll
> I'd like nothing better given the effort I put into writing the eigs
> function. I'm just not willing to chase Sorensen at this point, but
> would endorse anyone else who did.
I wonder if using ARPACK all over the place and hence flooding Rice with
letters would be an effective way of encouragement for a license
change ;)
Thomas
- eigs and Octave.app, Mark McClure, 2007/11/11
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Henry F. Mollet, 2007/11/11
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Mark McClure, 2007/11/11
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Henry F. Mollet, 2007/11/11
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, David Bateman, 2007/11/12
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Mark McClure, 2007/11/12
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, David Bateman, 2007/11/12
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, John W. Eaton, 2007/11/12
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, David Bateman, 2007/11/12
- Re: eigs and Octave.app,
Thomas Weber <=
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, David Bateman, 2007/11/13
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Thomas Treichl, 2007/11/12
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Mark McClure, 2007/11/12
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Mark McClure, 2007/11/13
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Henry F. Mollet, 2007/11/12
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Henry F. Mollet, 2007/11/12
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Thomas Treichl, 2007/11/13
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Mark McClure, 2007/11/12
- Message not available
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Thomas Treichl, 2007/11/13
- Re: eigs and Octave.app, Mark McClure, 2007/11/13