I have both of them
# update-alternatives --display mkoctfile
mkoctfile - status is auto.
link currently points to /usr/bin/mkoctfile-2.9.12
/usr/bin/mkoctfile-2.9.12 - priority 70
slave mkoctfile.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/mkoctfile-2.9.12.1.gz
Current `best' version is /usr/bin/mkoctfile-2.9.12.
The version of octave2.9-headers I installed is 2.9.12-2+b1
On 6/25/07, Michael Creel <address@hidden> wrote:
I'm working on something different, but I just installed
octave2.9-headers, and
I notice that I now have /usr/bin/mkoctfile2.9 but not
/usr/bin/mkoctfile. This
will cause problems for scripts that expect the second of these two. A
quick
simlink solves the problem. M.
Kim Hansen wrote:
> On 6/22/07, Evan <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I got octave 2.9.12 from debian archive. It seems that there is no
>> octave-devel package in debian archive, may be it hasn't been put into
>> debian archive? It's ok for me to waiting for that.
>
> Perhaps your problem is this bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420079
>
> If it is then installing octave2.9-headers should help.
>