[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about Range class
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Question about Range class |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:48:50 -0500 |
On 22-Nov-2005, Robert A. Macy wrote:
| Just curious, why is the order of the arguments...
| Range r (0.0, 10.0, 0.1); // base, limit, increment
| ...and not...
| Range r (0.0, 0.1, 10.0); // base, increment, limit
| ...to keep a similar order of arguments in octave's...
| z = [ 0 : 0.1 : 10 ]
| ...?
Why not? It seemed more natural to me at the time. Probably I was
still braindamaged by Fortran's DO loop syntax.
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Question about Range class, Marek Szczypinski, 2005/11/22
- Re: Question about Range class, Robert A. Macy, 2005/11/22
- Re: Question about Range class, John W. Eaton, 2005/11/22
- Re: Question about Range class, Pedro Antonio Fructuoso Merino, 2005/11/23
- Re: Question about Range class, Robert A. Macy, 2005/11/23
- Re: Question about Range class, Shai Ayal, 2005/11/24
- Re: Question about Range class, John W. Eaton, 2005/11/24
- Re: Question about Range class, Joe Koski, 2005/11/24
- Re: Question about Range class, Miroslaw Kwasniak, 2005/11/25
- Re: Question about Range class, Robert A. Macy, 2005/11/25
- Re: Question about Range class, Przemek Klosowski, 2005/11/25
- Re: Question about Range class, Robert A. Macy, 2005/11/25