|
From: | David Bateman |
Subject: | Re: which Linux distribution offers the best octave-support? |
Date: | Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:25:24 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040923) |
Javier Arantegui wrote:
The problem here is dependencies...You'll get a working octave, but it might be slower or incomplete. Do you have Atlas installed? If not it'll be slower. What if you want to build 2.9.x, do you have GLPK install, what about UFSparse? If not you'll miss out on some features. Having someone else already build the packages, they've already thought about and dealt with these dependencies. So yes building octave on an arbitrary platform might be easy enough, but unless you have a little experience you might not get the performance or completeness of a pre-packaged version...Hello, El Viernes, 4 de Noviembre de 2005 09:43, andreas naessl escribió:i simply wan't to minmize all that compilation / make - problems, cause i'm totally unexperienced with that. someone said, SUSE would be a bit weak regarding octave support. would be Fedora or Debian be a better choice ?I'm a SUSE user and totally clueless about compiling. But, I can compile Octave successfully. The process is quite easy (you just need to type 4 commands in a terminal) but slow.Javier
Regards David -- David Bateman address@hiddenMotorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE
The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
------------------------------------------------------------- Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html -------------------------------------------------------------
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |