Re: Problem with fourier transform

[Antonio L.]

> I'm not sure I understand why you don't want to use the inverse
> transform rather than writing out the Fourier series summation
> explicitly.  Seems like you could get what you want by using ifft()
> like this:

The reason is because I pretend to find a way of obtaining a smooth continuous
function out of a discrete one. Thus you could think in the continuous fourier
transform of the fourier transform of the discrete periodic original one. I
don't know if I've explained myselft.

     Thanks, Antonio.

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------