[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Which version of Octave?
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: Which version of Octave? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:26:57 -0600 (CST) |
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On the other hand, suckanalysis, the definitive scientific test for
> software quality, reveals that csh is better: there are 45 Google hits
> for the quoted phrase "csh sucks", while "bash sucks" comes with 152
> hits.
But bash is the default shell in Linux, the most widely used unixish OS.
So I think there is a big base-rate effect. Enter "england sucks" (4,660
hits) and "andorra sucks" (3 hits) and you get the idea - no one,
practically speaking is writing about Andorra.
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Which version of Octave?, (continued)
- Re: Which version of Octave?, John W. Eaton, 2004/03/25
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Dirk Eddelbuettel, 2004/03/26
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/26
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Mike Miller, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Francesco Potorti`, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Przemek Klosowski, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?,
Mike Miller <=