[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Which version of Octave?
From: |
Henry F. Mollet |
Subject: |
Re: Which version of Octave? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:41:17 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 |
Hi Joe,
So let me bring this back to octave on Mac. Installation of Octave on Mac is
apparently much more difficult than it should be unless you're a Unix guru.
If I upgrade to Panther, I'd rather not read a bash manual. Should Mac not
mean easy installation of Octave? Something corresponding to a binary .exe
as is available for Windows? Why do we need Fink or DarwinPorts to be able
to install Octave? As much as I try, I just don't understand nor need this
complication regarding the installation or upgrading of octave on a Mac.
Henry
on 3/23/04 1:12 PM, Joe Koski at address@hidden wrote:
> on 3/23/04 11:30 AM, Henry F. Mollet at address@hidden wrote:
>
>> Joe,
>> Why could you not change to tcsh (advanced csh) as your default shell? Is
>> the bash shell, similar to the Bourne shell, not a step backward?
>> Henry
>>
> This is probably not the proper forum for the UNIX shell debate. The bash
> shell is now the "standard" for OS X Panther. I could apparently switch back
> to tcsh without installing anything.
>
> Years ago, when I was using the Korn shell (K-shell) on HP machines and I'd
> ask how to do something, the local UNIX gurus would always reply with
> something like "I don't know, I use C-shell." My thought is that staying
> with the "standard" shell will avoid this type of answer for questions
> directed toward the Apple/Panther community.
>
> The more pertinent issues may be: Which shell is prevalent on the Linux
> machines that seem to be the native habitat for Octave? Is there a shell
> that has some particular advantages for the Octave user?
>
> Joe
>
>> on 3/22/04 7:42 PM, Joe Koski at address@hidden wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to all for their suggestions on how to install the latest Octave and
>>> octave-forge under Panther on a Mac. As soon as I feel a bit more
>>> comfortable with the (new to me) bash shell, I think I'll try to build
>>> Octave 2.1.57, perhaps from cvs. So far, I have the developer tools (gcc),
>>> X11, and g77 successfully installed and tested. A bash manual is in the mail
>>> from Amazon. Stay tuned...
>>>
>>> Joe Koski
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
>>
>> Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
>> How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
>> Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/20
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Paul Kienzle, 2004/03/20
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Vic Norton, 2004/03/20
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Per Persson, 2004/03/22
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/22
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Henry F. Mollet, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?,
Henry F. Mollet <=
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Jonathan Stickel, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, A S Hodel, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, John B. Thoo, 2004/03/25
- Re: Which version of Octave?, A S Hodel, 2004/03/25
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Michael Martin, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Paul Kienzle, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Christoph Dalitz, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Paul Kienzle, 2004/03/24