[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Which version of Octave?
From: |
Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: |
Re: Which version of Octave? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:03:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 |
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Well, let's not start the 'which shell is better' debate. Many people think
that the csh shell family is inferior; read the essay at
http://www.cs.brown.edu/people/scs/why.csh.sucks.
This is an entertaining read, but most issues discussed there do not
apply for 'tcsh'. That being said, bash seems to be the standard linux shell
though
some distribution still may make 'tcsh' a user (not root) default shell.
(Slackware used to do it some 9 years ago when I used it last time.)
Regards,
Dmitri.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Which version of Octave?, (continued)
- Re: Which version of Octave?, John W. Eaton, 2004/03/25
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Dirk Eddelbuettel, 2004/03/26
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/26
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Mike Miller, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Francesco Potorti`, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Przemek Klosowski, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?,
Dmitri A. Sergatskov <=
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Mike Miller, 2004/03/23