[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem with column specification in matrices
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: problem with column specification in matrices |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:29:17 -0600 (CST) |
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, John W. Eaton wrote:
> In an expression like
>
> [n (1+1./n).^n]
>
> should that be interpreted as two expressions
>
> [n, (1+1./n).^n]
>
> or as one, with n indexed by the second expression (that's what you'd
> get without the square brackets).
>
> IMHO, it was bad design for Matlab to make whitespace magic inside the
> square brackets.
Thanks, John. I was a little perplexed when [n n] did what I expected. I
guess the bottom line is this: A comma will always work for me.
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------