[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad random numbers
From: |
Eric Ortega |
Subject: |
Re: bad random numbers |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:05:17 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, A+A Adler wrote:
<snip>
> If you think the situation is "bad" in octave, just try matlab.
> Matlab 5.3, SunOS 5.5 always gives the following matrix
> >> rand(3)
> ans =
> 0.9501 0.4860 0.4565
> 0.2311 0.8913 0.0185
> 0.6068 0.7621 0.8214
>
> for the first call of rand, every time you run matlab.
rand(3) in Matlab 5.1.0.421 on an SGI64 (Irix 6.5) _and_ SGI6 (Irix 6.2)
gives the same matrix as above.
But Matlab has plenty of problems, none of them correctable without serious
whining.
eo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. To ensure
that development continues, see www.che.wisc.edu/octave/giftform.html
Instructions for unsubscribing: www.che.wisc.edu/octave/archive.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: bad random numbers, (continued)
- Re: bad random numbers, John W. Eaton, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, A+A Adler, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, Mike Miller, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, John Judge, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, lash, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, Mike Miller, 1999/07/14
- Re: bad random numbers, lash, 1999/07/14
- Re: bad random numbers, Jim Van Zandt, 1999/07/14
- Re: bad random numbers, John W. Eaton, 1999/07/14
- Re: bad random numbers, Thomas Walter, 1999/07/14
- Re: bad random numbers,
Eric Ortega <=
Re: bad random numbers, Jim Van Zandt, 1999/07/14
Re: bad random numbers, John Smith, 1999/07/14
Re: bad random numbers, heberf, 1999/07/13