[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad random numbers
From: |
Jim Van Zandt |
Subject: |
Re: bad random numbers |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:49:02 -0400 |
> > I think it would be good to have Bill Lash's code incorporated
> > in the standard octave source. I'm assuming it does what it's
> > supposed to do and won't cause problems on other systems.
> >
>
> If John wants to incorporate the patch, that is fine by me, but
> remember that it was a quick hack, and that it does have some
> limitations.
I second someone else's suggestion that /dev/urandom be used where
available (Linux only, AFAIK). Second choice would be gettimeofday(),
and third choice would be time().
- Jim Van Zandt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. To ensure
that development continues, see www.che.wisc.edu/octave/giftform.html
Instructions for unsubscribing: www.che.wisc.edu/octave/archive.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: bad random numbers, (continued)
- Re: bad random numbers, Mike Miller, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, John W. Eaton, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, Mike Miller, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, John W. Eaton, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, A+A Adler, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, Mike Miller, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, John Judge, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, lash, 1999/07/13
- Re: bad random numbers, Mike Miller, 1999/07/14
- Re: bad random numbers, lash, 1999/07/14
- Re: bad random numbers,
Jim Van Zandt <=
- Re: bad random numbers, John W. Eaton, 1999/07/14
- Re: bad random numbers, Thomas Walter, 1999/07/14
- Re: bad random numbers, Eric Ortega, 1999/07/15
Re: bad random numbers, Jim Van Zandt, 1999/07/14
Re: bad random numbers, John Smith, 1999/07/14
Re: bad random numbers, heberf, 1999/07/13