Re: is this a bug?

[Vu Nguyen-Cong]

> The following is what I did with octave-2.0.8 on Linux
> 
> z = [
>    1       0       0
>    1       0       0
>    0       1       0
>    0       1       0
>    0       0       1
>    0       0       1
> ];
> 
> z(:, any(z))
> 
> ans =
> 
>   1  1  1
>   1  1  1
>   0  0  0
>   0  0  0
>   0  0  0
>   0  0  0
> 
> Vu Nguyen-Cong
> address@hidden
>
> 
> If you set prefer_zero_one_indexing to 1, Octave will return the
> original matrix for this example.  Is that what you were expecting?
> 
> The next major release of Octave will have a boolean type that will
> eliminate this ambiguity and the need for the prefer_zero_one_indexing
> variable.
> 
> jwe

Thank you indeed for your help.
Regards,
Vu Nguyen-Cong