Re: Hurd FS hierarchy in FHS.

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Gerhard Muntingh <gerhardm@muntingh.tmfweb.nl> writes:

> That's not a reason to include an annex.  The FHS specifies
> a consistent environment for POSIX software.  It's should
> not contain OS specific contents (IMO).

FHS has always had the attitude that it would have OS-specific
annexes.  And here, we can take advantage of that.  So we should.

> It's just like GNU/Hurd patches for packages.  It's the
> art to make them independend of platform, _not_ to add
> support for GNU/Hurd.

Huh?  Why shouldn't we do both, when appropriate?

Thomas