[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Running several instances of an fs server...
From: |
Richard Kreuter |
Subject: |
Re: Running several instances of an fs server... |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2002 12:06:17 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:31:00PM +0200, Wolfgang Jährling wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@utbm.fr> wrote:
> > Since filesystems can be `mounted' in users directories, serveral
> > users of the same machine are very likely to mount the same
> > filesystem in their own home dir, so that's an important issue.
>
> Why should multiple users have access to the same store?
<Not necessarily on-topic> Maybe something like network storage
device access? Maybe a filesystem server who used a
network-accessible store could turn out to be better than nfs. Just a
thought.
<Even more not necessarily on-topic> If there turn out to be good
reasons why multiple users would want write access to the same file
hierarchy without clobbering each others' work, probably shadowfs will
be the way to do it.
Regards,
Richard
- Re: Running several instances of an fs server..., (continued)
- Re: Running several instances of an fs server..., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/25
- Re: Running several instances of an fs server..., Niels Möller, 2002/05/26
- Re: Running several instances of an fs server..., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/26
- Re: Running several instances of an fs server..., Niels Möller, 2002/05/27
- Re: Running several instances of an fs server..., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/27
Re: Running several instances of an fs server..., Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/05/24
- Re: Running several instances of an fs server...,
Richard Kreuter <=
Re: Running several instances of an fs server..., Ryan M. Golbeck, 2002/05/24
Re: Running several instances of an fs server..., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/25