FW: [address@hidden: hurd-paper again]

[Jim Franklin]

-----Original Message-----
From: web-hurd-admin@gnu.org [mailto:web-hurd-admin@gnu.org]On Behalf Of
Paul Visscher
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 3:25 PM
To: web-hurd@gnu.org
Cc: webmasters@gnu.org
Subject: [vlegoll@apsydev.com: hurd-paper again]


same...

----- Forwarded message from Vincent Legoll <vlegoll@apsydev.com> -----

Subject: hurd-paper again
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 15:59:04 +0200
From: "Vincent Legoll" <vlegoll@apsydev.com>
To: <webmasters@www.gnu.org>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400

Could you explain a bit more precisely this sentence in 5th paragraph of
"The translator mechanism" @
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd-paper.html
"However, the Hurd is constructed so that the worst possible consequence is
an
interruptible hang."
 
I can't clearly understand what "hangs" (and what is required to interrupt
that
hang).
You meant the wrong process used as a translator hangs and the system can
recover
from that situation by interrupting (a CTRL-C / SIGINT equivalent) this
process
?
 
--
Vince
 

----- End forwarded message -----

--paulv

ATT00144.dat
Description: PGP signature