help-grub
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Valid grub.conf locations


From: Andrei Borzenkov
Subject: Re: Valid grub.conf locations
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 14:31:52 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0

On 21.06.2023 12:08, Ulrich Sibiller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 2:18 PM Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> wrote:
RH grub unconditionally loads grub.cfg from $cmdpath (which they renamed
to fw_path) without any way to override this behavior. I hesitate to
call this improvement.

Well, I cannot judge here. From my POV it looks reasonable to do so
because you can then use the same efi file regardless of the boot
method. The override should be added, though. YMMV.


You already can use the same EFI file regardless of the boot method. SUSE does it without any hacks.

(This brings up one question which somebody might know the answer: the
Centos7 version of grub has 486 patches. I am wondering why these
patches never made it to upstream. Is there simply lack of manpower?
Have these patches never reached upstream? Have they been rejected?)

Do you know anything about this?


It is quite possible that most of these patches are actually upstream patches.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]