Re: [help-GIFT] Optimizing

[risc]

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:45:50PM +0100, David Squire wrote:
> address@hidden wrote:
> 
> >I don't find the branch idea to be a great one, because what appears to be 
> >already happening is everyone is using their own branches, and the one in 
> >the tree, which is the one that people new to the project will use, is 
> >being left to rot. David's criticism of that optimization is valid, I'll 
> >be adding a MAX_WIDTH and MAX_HEIGHT, so that both of us are satisfied. 
> >All of my allocation changes are already in tree, and this one is the only 
> >one that we both agree was a "badly implemented idea". 
> 
> Not so fast. I still haven't read everything that happened while I was
> walking :) I had about 500 non-spam emails to deal with when I returned...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> David
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr David McG. Squire, Senior Lecturer, on sabbatical in 2006
> Caulfield School of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia
> CRICOS Provider No. 00008C        http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~davids/
> 

David,

Have you had time to read the other two patches (70 and 80)?

Heres a new version of patch 60, with your and johan's input.

I've been dead busy for a while, so i'm just getting around to this.

If you have no objections, i'd like to apply this, and patch 70 and 80
come next tuesday. should make a big difference.

(yes, memset is faster. thanks johan)

Wolfgang:

I'm about 5 or 6 patches from getting to re-structuring as you 
suggested. I just want to get this work in before tackling something
else. :)

Julia Longtin <address@hidden>

60-ChangeLog
Description: Text document

60-FeatureExtraction_gabor_c-static_conv_and_C99_datatypes.patch
Description: Text document

60-FeatureExtraction_gift_features_h-static_conv.patch
Description: Text document