[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:02:36 +0200 |
> From: "Francis Wright" <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:08:01 -0000
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Perhaps Windows programs read the keyboard differently from Linux programs.
That is certainly the case, at some level of the OS.
> It might be interesting to try the Cygwin version of Emacs, which should be
> more like the Linux version.
I cannot imagine this would make any difference: Cygwin programs are
Windows executables, and as such, must use Windows APIs for reading
the keyboard. There's no Linux kernel working anywhere when a Cygwin
program runs.
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, David Vanderschel, 2007/01/22
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Francis Wright, 2007/01/23
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Ryan Krauss, 2007/01/25
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Francis Wright, 2007/01/25
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Francis Wright, 2007/01/26
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/26
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Dallman, John, 2007/01/26
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/26
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/26
- RE: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Stephen F. Heffner, 2007/01/26
- Re: [h-e-w] no C-spc, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/26