[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?
From: |
Christopher Baines |
Subject: |
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches? |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:57:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 |
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:
> I see a few "Failed to process revision", for instance here:
> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/68778
> While I am not sure why, these look like transient (?) build failures,
> at least failures not related to the patch in question. What is there to do?
Long term it would be nice for Guile to segfault less, in the short term
though sending the patch again will trigger the data service to try
again.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Christopher Baines, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Clément Lassieur, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Christopher Baines, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Andreas Enge, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Andreas Enge, 2024/02/11
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Andreas Enge, 2024/02/09
- Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?,
Christopher Baines <=
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Vivien Kraus, 2024/02/10
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Vivien Kraus, 2024/02/10
Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?, Ian Eure, 2024/02/11