Re: Questions about packages because of license and other

[Ada Stevenson]

Hi,

On 12/6/23 8:36 PM, Christian Miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. PrismLauncher[0]: The software itself is licensed as GPL3 but it is
> used to download and launch a proprietary videogame called
> "Minecraft".  Since it is itself GPL3 licensed but used for a
> proprietary videogame, would it be allowed for upstream or not?

This is already included in the Guix-Gaming[1] channel.

> 2: PCSX2[1]: Software itself is licensed as GPL3 but is used to
> emulate a PlayStation 2 (game console), which is highly proprietary
> hardware.  It is also wishlisted on libreplanet[2].  It requires the
> original proprietary BIOS (not distributed by the software) to run.
> Since it is a game console, it also requires proprietary video games
> (not distributed by the software).
For these gaming related packages that require non-free software, 
perhaps it might be a good idea to contribute to Guix-Gaming[1] instead, 
rather than upstream.
> 3. impatient-mode[3]: This is an Emacs mode to write HTML and see it
> in realtime rendered in the web browser.  It has no license file.  In
> the file "impatient-mode.el" it says "This is free and unencumbered
> software released into the public domain.".  Is this suitable for an
> upstream package?  It looks to me not correctly licensed but I am also
> not an expert in this and therefore unsure.
Public domain would be suitable for inclusion, though.
> PrismLauncher works but does not show images from the instance.
>
> PCSX2 works but does not show icons.
>
> Imaptient-mode is done.
>
> Since it is better to push as much as possible upstream, would they
> met the requirements or not?
>
> [0] https://github.com/PrismLauncher/PrismLauncher
> [1] https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2
> [2] https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/Wishlist#Emulation
> [3] https://github.com/skeeto/impatient-mode
[1] https://gitlab.com/guix-gaming-channels/games

Thanks,

Ada (adanksa)