Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is
> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside
> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing
> it).
>
> I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that,
> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in
> the manual).  Patch below.
>
> What do people think?

Sounds good.

> If maintainers and everyone agrees, I’d like to publicly email all the
> authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing
> terms, or whether they’d like a different free license.  The script
> below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup
> still):
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,pp authors
> $22 = ("A collective of GNU maintainers"
[…]
>  "Ricardo (rekado) Wurmus"
>  "Ricardo Wurmus"

I agree.

-- 
Ricardo