[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ImageMagick from 2020?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: ImageMagick from 2020? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:00:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com> skribis:
> I also played around with it and came up with
>
> https://ngyro.com/pog-reports/2022-01-16/missing-sources.json
>
> This is a “sources.json” that only lists the “missing” and “unknown”
> sources from the PoG report. It lists sources across all commits (since
> 1.0.0). This might be the easiest thing for SWH to handle, since it
> omits nearly 20k sources that they definitely already have. Since they
> don’t have the tarball hashes, they have no way to skip downloading and
> processing tarballs that they already have by hash. Hence, filtering it
> with the extra data we have through the PoG projects should be something
> that they welcome!
>
> If they want, they could point a loader task at
>
> https://ngyro.com/pog-reports/latest/missing-sources.json
>
> and I could publish updates when I publish new PoG reports.
Sounds great! Could you ask them whether they could do that? It may be
that it’s going to be a one-time thing, if everything goes well.
> There’s one other thing to think about. Some of our sources are
> arguably unsuitable for SWH. For instance, our bootstrap binaries. I
> bet we have a bunch of other borderline things, too, like game assets.
> Of course, if they are indiscriminately ingesting Github, I’m sure
> they’ve loaded plenty of garbage. Mostly, I think about these things
> because I believe it’s important to maintain the Guix-SWH relationship.
Right, it would be nice to filter them out somehow, even though it’s a
drop in the ocean of binaries that SWH ingests routinely (for instance
that’s the reason why we find some tarballs, as is, via
‘lookup-content’).
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- ImageMagick from 2020?, zimoun, 2022/01/10
- Re: ImageMagick from 2020?, Timothy Sample, 2022/01/10
- Re: ImageMagick from 2020?, Maxime Devos, 2022/01/10
- Re: ImageMagick from 2020?, zimoun, 2022/01/10
- Re: ImageMagick from 2020?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/01/18
- Re: ImageMagick from 2020?, zimoun, 2022/01/18
- Re: ImageMagick from 2020?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/01/19
- Re: ImageMagick from 2020?, zimoun, 2022/01/19
- Re: ImageMagick from 2020?, Timothy Sample, 2022/01/22
- Re: ImageMagick from 2020?,
Ludovic Courtès <=