[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix Documentation Meetup
From: |
André A . Gomes |
Subject: |
Re: Guix Documentation Meetup |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:05:06 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Matt <matt@excalamus.com> writes:
> > I see that this all seems confusing.
>
> Thank you for your response and for acknowledging my perspective.
> Yes, I find many things about the documentation process confusing. I
> can't speak for others, but I get the strong sense that I'm not alone
> in that feeling.
You're not alone, but honestly I think Guix's efforts are heroic to say
the least. How many software has no documentation at all? I always
gaze at the quality of Guix's manual.
> First, the packaging tutorial is, I believe, a reasonable candidate
> for the cookbook. It's ready for feedback toward inclusion, not
> direct inclusion. The software being packaged isn't ideal as it
> involves concepts which may detract from the main subject of
> packaging, like stenography. It's also for a plugin and not standalone
> software. Demonstrating the final package requires demonstrating the
> parent application which again detracts from the main subject of
> packaging. Finally, it's written using active voice which conveys
> authority on the topic, authority I don't actually have. This was my
> first attempt at packaging.
>
> Second, the troubleshooting post is not, in my option, suited for the
> cookbook. It is, however, a good candidate for a wiki page (similar to
> Arch wiki sections on troubleshooting). The last time a wiki was
> talked about, it seems, was in 2015. I'll start a thread for that.
Please don't misinterpret the following comments. You're doing
something valuable for the community by the mere fact of talking about
Guix - your writings are valuable! But I don't see how the 1st one
could land in a cookbook. Regarding the 2nd and the wiki, as someone
(perhaps you) already noted, wikis generally host low quality content.
Guix's documentation has a ton of examples, perhaps even too many for an
expository kind of text. Yes, I'm not a fan of wiki. Regardless, the
efforts of such a wiki should perhaps land outside the scope of Guix
(i.e. it should be non-"official").
I'm not connected with Guix with any way - a mere enthusiast and
observer.
I hope you continue to write great articles like these!
--
André A. Gomes
"Free Thought, Free World"
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, (continued)
Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, calcium, 2022/01/08
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/01/08
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, calcium, 2022/01/08
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, Matt, 2022/01/08
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/01/08
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, Leo Famulari, 2022/01/08
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, Matt, 2022/01/09
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup,
André A . Gomes <=
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, Matt, 2022/01/10
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, André A . Gomes, 2022/01/10
- Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, Matt, 2022/01/11
Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, Leo Famulari, 2022/01/12
Re: Guix Documentation Meetup, Matt, 2022/01/12
Planet of Guix-related posts?, zimoun, 2022/01/10
Re: Planet of Guix-related posts?, Matt, 2022/01/11
Re: Planet of Guix-related posts?, Matt, 2022/01/11
Re: Planet of Guix-related posts?, André A . Gomes, 2022/01/12
Re: Planet of Guix-related posts?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/01/12