Re: [PATCH v2] doc: Document SRFI 64.

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi Maxime,

Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> writes:

> Op 18-11-2023 om 05:42 schreef Maxim Cournoyer:
>>   * SRFI-61::                     A more general `cond' clause
>>   * SRFI-62::                     S-expression comments.
>> -* SRFI-64::                     A Scheme API for test suites.
>> +* SRFI 64::                     A Scheme API for test suites.
>>   * SRFI-67::                     Compare procedures
>>   * SRFI-69::                     Basic hash tables.
>>   * SRFI-71::                     Extended let-syntax for multiple values.
>
> That seems rather inconsistent.

It is in Guile (for now), but upstream nobody appears to calls "SRFI 64"
as "SRFI-64", so unless we are constrained to use a hyphen, it seems
more correct to leave it.  If it makes sense, I could send a patch
automating the simple substitution to standardize on no hyphen for all
of our SRFIs nodes / section names.

>> +@c This SRFI 64 documentation was "snarfed" from upstream specification
>> +@c HTML document using the 'snarfi' script.
>
> That HTML document comes with a license that requires:
>
>> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
>> included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

> yet I'm not seeing those notices in the texi.

I've added a copyright notice to srfi-modules.texi and the Expat license
text to @copying in guile.texi, see v3.

Thanks for taking a look!

-- 
Maxim