[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (. wtf?)
|
From: |
Dmitry Alexandrov |
|
Subject: |
Re: (. wtf?) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 08 May 2023 13:45:43 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab@web.de> wrote:
> If I understood it correctly
Yes, thank you.
> they
Just to clarify: I have no claims to represent anyoneʼs view but my own.
Having said that, the fact, that by writing a reader without keeping this very
case in mind, you get _this_ behaviour (as @janneke@todon.nl put it) “for
free”, clearly hints who (Guile/Kawa/Mes or Racket/Chez/Chicken) aligns with
schemey way of minimizing the amount of rules and exceptions in a language
better. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature