Re: [PATCH] Document R7RS bytevector functions

[lloda]

Hi Ludovic, 

thanks for the review. Second version attached.

> We should keep the manual in sync with docstrings in bytevectors.c.
> 
> Thus, my suggestion would be to not insert comments and footnotes about
> R7RS in the existing sections, but instead to do that in the new section.

Following this, I've removed the footnotes & references to R7RS in the main 
section.

Patch aside:

I still think the links are useful, so I'd like to find a way to put them back. 
I think someone who finds their way into the doc for r6rs bytevector-copy 
should be told that there are in fact different versions of this procedure. 
Just in general, I think there should be many more links in the doc.

Regards

  Daniel

0001-Document-R7RS-functions-related-to-bytevectors.patch
Description: Binary data