[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GC + Java finalization
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: GC + Java finalization |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2021 13:17:55 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Jonas Hahnfeld schreef op do 15-07-2021 om 20:44 [+0200]:
> + /* For guardians, we use unordered finalization `a la Java. */
Maybe add the reasons why this is only done when a guardian is created?
E.g.,
/* Don't use unordered finalization when not using guardians,
because Java finalization prevents fast collection of chains of
unreachable objects */
Not 100% about the exact purpose of avoiding Java-style finalization,
you might want to adjust the wording somewhat ...
Greetings,
Maxime
- Re: GC + Java finalization, (continued)
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/11/19
Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19
Re: GC + Java finalization,
Maxime Devos <=
Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/20