[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GC + Java finalization
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: GC + Java finalization |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2021 13:13:01 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Jonas Hahnfeld schreef op do 15-07-2021 om 20:44 [+0200]:
> From 33af6a98c6801e7b4880d1d3f78f7e2097c2174e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> From: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de>
> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 23:03:17 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Avoid matching calls of scm_gc_free
>
> There is no point in registering memory with the garbage collector
> if it doesn't need to do its job. In fact, calling scm_gc_free in
> a free function is wrong because it relies on Java finalization.
>
> * libguile/random.c (scm_c_random_bignum): Replace matching calls of
> scm_gc_calloc and scm_gc_free.
> * libguile/regex-posix.c (scm_make_regexp, regex_free): Avoid call
> of scm_gc_free in free function.
> * test-suite/standalone/test-smob-mark.c (make_x, free_x): Avoid
> call of scm_gc_free in free function.
> ---
> THANKS | 1 +
> libguile/random.c | 8 ++------
> libguile/regex-posix.c | 6 +++---
> test-suite/standalone/test-smob-mark.c | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/THANKS b/THANKS
> index aa4877e95..786b65d1a 100644
> --- a/THANKS
> +++ b/THANKS
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Contributors since the last release:
> Volker Grabsch
> Julian Graham
> Michael Gran
> + Jonas Hahnfeld
> Daniel Hartwig
> No Itisnt
> Neil Jerram
> diff --git a/libguile/random.c b/libguile/random.c
> index 63da7f5d6..ac400a9fd 100644
> --- a/libguile/random.c
> +++ b/libguile/random.c
> @@ -324,9 +324,7 @@ scm_c_random_bignum (scm_t_rstate *state, SCM m)
> /* we know the result will be this big */
> mpz_realloc2 (SCM_I_BIG_MPZ (result), m_bits);
>
> - random_chunks =
> - (uint32_t *) scm_gc_calloc (num_chunks * sizeof (uint32_t),
> - "random bignum chunks");
> + random_chunks = (uint32_t *) scm_calloc (num_chunks * sizeof
> (uint32_t));
>
> do
> {
> @@ -363,9 +361,7 @@ scm_c_random_bignum (scm_t_rstate *state, SCM m)
> /* if result >= m, regenerate it (it is important to
> regenerate
> all bits in order not to get a distorted distribution) */
> } while (mpz_cmp (SCM_I_BIG_MPZ (result), SCM_I_BIG_MPZ (m)) >=
> 0);
> - scm_gc_free (random_chunks,
> - num_chunks * sizeof (uint32_t),
> - "random bignum chunks");
> + free (random_chunks);
>From the manual (about scm_gc_calloc & friends):
‘Memory blocks allocated this way may
be released explicitly; however, this is not strictly needed, and we
recommend _not_ calling ‘scm_gc_free’. All memory allocated with
‘scm_gc_malloc’ or ‘scm_gc_malloc_pointerless’ is automatically
reclaimed when the garbage collector no longer sees any live reference
to it(1).’
As such, I'd recommend simply dropping the scm_gc_free
(here and in other places), if the scm_gc_free was problematic
because of Java finalization reasons.
> return scm_i_normbig (result);
> }
>
> diff --git a/libguile/regex-posix.c b/libguile/regex-posix.c
> index a08da02db..36bb639e0 100644
> --- a/libguile/regex-posix.c
> +++ b/libguile/regex-posix.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static size_t
> regex_free (SCM obj)
> {
> regfree (SCM_RGX (obj));
> - scm_gc_free (SCM_RGX (obj), sizeof(regex_t), "regex");
> + free (SCM_RGX (obj));
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_make_regexp, "make-regexp", 1, 0,
> 1,
> flag = SCM_CDR (flag);
> }
>
> - rx = scm_gc_malloc_pointerless (sizeof (regex_t), "regex");
> + rx = scm_malloc (sizeof (regex_t));
If the regex why scm_gc_malloc_pointerless -> scm_malloc?
Is rx not pointerless? You coud simply ...
> - scm_gc_free (rx, sizeof(regex_t), "regex");
> + free (rx);
drop the scm_gc_free AFAIK.
Greetings,
Maxime
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization,
Maxime Devos <=
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/11/19
- Re: GC + Java finalization, Maxime Devos, 2021/11/19