[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: moving ata initialisation to a command
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: moving ata initialisation to a command |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:26:31 -0500 |
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 17:01 +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> A better solution, IMO, would be changing grub-mkrescue so it doesn't
> load all modules.
Maybe grub-mkrescue should create a filesystem? Even FAT should be
fine. This way, it will be possible to load problematic modules from
the filesystem. The only problem would be dependency on filesystem
making tools. Fortunately, mtools is quite common.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- moving ata initialisation to a command, Robert Millan, 2007/12/16
- Re: moving ata initialisation to a command, Christian Franke, 2007/12/16
- Re: moving ata initialisation to a command, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2007/12/16
- Re: moving ata initialisation to a command, Marco Gerards, 2007/12/17
- Re: moving ata initialisation to a command,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: moving ata initialisation to a command, Robert Millan, 2007/12/20
- Re: moving ata initialisation to a command, Marco Gerards, 2007/12/21
- Re: moving ata initialisation to a command, Robert Millan, 2007/12/21
- embedding filesystems in core image (Re: moving ata initialisation to a command), Robert Millan, 2007/12/21
- Re: embedding filesystems in core image (Re: moving ata initialisation to a command), Bean, 2007/12/21
- Re: embedding filesystems in core image (Re: moving ata initialisation to a command), Robert Millan, 2007/12/22
- Re: embedding filesystems in core image (Re: moving ata initialisation to a command), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2007/12/22
- Re: embedding filesystems in core image (Re: moving ata initialisation to a command), Robert Millan, 2007/12/23