[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] startup.S does not find includes
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] startup.S does not find includes |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:22:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 06:31:22AM -0700, walt wrote:
> Christian Franke wrote:
> >Robert Millan wrote:
> >>On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:56:21PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>some recent checkin appearently introduces the following regression:
> >>>
> >>>Compilation fails if configure'd outside of $(srcdir).
> >>>#include "kern/i386/realmode.S" and "kern/i386/loader.S" fail in
> >>>startup.S.
> >>
> >>Uhm I just noticed that previously existing #includes have relative
> >>paths,
> >>e.g.:
> >>
> >>#include "lzo1x.S"
> >>
> >>Perhaps I should have done the same instead of adding new include dirs.
> >>
> >>Thoughts?
> >>
> >
> >For kern/i386/pc/startup.S:
> >
> >#include "../realmode.S" // include pc-independent i386 realmode code
> >
> >Should work without any -I option.
>
> I considered that, but wouldn't it break compilation when building
> in-tree, ie without an obj directory?
Why would it?
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)