[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0
|
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
|
Subject: |
Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2022 23:40:12 -0500 |
At 2022-05-21T22:41:58-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Yes, I think so. As I understand it, the HTML devices ("html" and
> "xhtml") _are_ the problem in this regard. Or they once were. A quick
> experiment reveals that `.PD 0` and `.PD` work fine at least for simple
> cases in HTML output. See attachment.
As usually happens, I forgot the attachment.
Trying again.
PD.man
Description: PD.man
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0, Douglas McIlroy, 2022/05/22
- Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0, Ingo Schwarze, 2022/05/22
- Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0, Ralph Corderoy, 2022/05/23
- Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0, G. Branden Robinson, 2022/05/23
- Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0, Ralph Corderoy, 2022/05/23
- Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0, Ingo Schwarze, 2022/05/23
- Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0, G. Branden Robinson, 2022/05/24
- Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0, Ingo Schwarze, 2022/05/24
- Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0, Humm, 2022/05/24