gnunet-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Idea: Owning Artworks On GNUnet using Non-Fungible Hashes


From: hyazinthe
Subject: Re: Re: Idea: Owning Artworks On GNUnet using Non-Fungible Hashes
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:52:09 +0100

> The slightest glimpse of disastrous copy law is an optical to said ideal 
> frame for maximizing creativity.

Of course, I mean, 'obstacle', not 'optical'.

--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Von: <hyazinthe@emailn.de>
Datum: 10.01.2022 14:42:15
An: gnunet-developers@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: Idea: Owning Artworks On GNUnet using Non-Fungible Hashes

> My 2 cents:
>
> Take a look around. Your crib, the tech stuff in front of you, look down
> at your clothes. Think of all the immaterial goods, which have made your
> days of the past, and how much they formed you. All of that: A product of
> creativity—useful and new, at the same time.
>
> How much do we appreciate this? Where would we be without it? Still in caves?
>
>
> The appropriate way to appreciate is giving back by maximizing creativity.
>
>
> But, you can't. You can't directly. It's like being spontaneous.
> When someone asks you to be spontaneous, you can't by that moment.
>
> Creativity only can be maximized by forming the frame, in which creativity
> arises.
> And that frame has 2 adjusting screws:
> 1. The more variety, the more tension—especially contrary, especially 
> contrast—there
> is within a network system, the more creativity arises out of it.
> 2. The more connections there are within a network system, the more creativity
> arises out of it.
>
> So, the frame which maximizes creativity is one, where there are all kinds
> of entities and all of them are directly connected with each others. It's
> a place of everything and no boundaries.
>
> That means: It's a place where all immaterial goods are copylefted commons—not
> even requiring linking a specific immaterial good to a subject, who has made
> it.
> The slightest glimpse of disastrous copy law is an optical to said ideal
> frame for maximizing creativity.
>
> Best for all of us would be, if all immaterial goods including artwork is
> shared, not attempted to be owned whatsoever. And not only that, on top of
> that this state of freedom being defended.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Bastian Schmidt
>
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: carlo von lynX <lynX@time.to.get.psyced.org>
> Datum: 09.01.2022 17:15:18
> An: gnunet-developers@gnu.org
> Betreff: Idea: Owning Artworks On GNUnet using Non-Fungible Hashes
>
> > As much as I notoriously doubt that the end-to-end
> > encryption Whatsapp actually stops agencies from
> > having any insight, I appreciate Moxie's recent dive
> > into the world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs):
> >
> > https://moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-first-impressions.html
> >
> > I heard similar doubts from CCC people last summer,
> > but it is good for someone to put it in strong and
> > clear terms, combining it with the critique against
> > federation and open standards which the secushare.org
> > website has been carrying for a decade now.
> >
> > The following implies you read that blog post first.
> > It's an interesting worthwhile read.
> >
> > The "Web3" is a joke, as much as the people that claim
> > to be into "crypto", then even fail to put a hash of
> > a piece of art into the blockchain rather than just
> > somebody else's URL.
> >
> > Obviously while I read all of that, I thought how on
> > the basis of GNUnet instead it could all work out for
> > real.
> >
> > 1. GNUnet is *meant* to run on all devices, including
> > smartphones. The phone companies may have to adapt!
> > There must not arise any "platform" web services that
> > run the GNUnet node for you. We switched to AGPL
> > license because of this and should pressure any
> > alternative implementation of GNUnet to also be
> > released under Affero GPL or stricter! As soon as
> > we allow nodes to be run elsewhere than on the device
> > of the owner, several of our design goals are gone -
> > and the article illustrates how people do not care.
> >
> > 2. We already have consensus protocols on top of
> > GNUnet. If we add a ledger we can store the ownership
> > of hashes of artworks which AFAIR also happen to be
> > the handles for retrieval on gnunet-fs.
> >
> > 3. If we implement the social graph in secushare.org
> > we can avoid using dirty proof-of-work but rather
> > provide a blockchain by proof-of-having-a-life. The
> > proof that you exist and have a life is the fact
> > that you have a social surrounding which isn't just
> > avatars you created yourself.
> >
> > So, whoopa, we have a new Internet with a new
> > distributed Facebook/Skype replacement, a way to
> > do blockchain apps without ruining the environment
> > and a way to prove ownership of digital artworks.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]