[gNewSense-users] Re: unclear licence of AMSLatex (fwd)

[Benedikt Ahrens]

is on its way.

b

> Thanks for following up on this.


> Do they say which version of LPPL they're going to use? Both 1.2 and 1.3a are 
> free software licenses, but according to the FSF license list [1] 1.2 can 
> have additional restrictions that make some files non-free.

> Would they agree to retroactively add the same license to (recent) earlier 
> versions (including the one in gNS 2.x), so that those versions become 
> dual-licensed? Even just a short public statement that's not (necessarily) 
> legally binding would make me much more comfortable about keeping the package 
> in gNS.


-- 
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser