Re: [gNewSense-users] Suspected non-free software and bugs.

[Kevin Dean]

I'm not exactly certain what happened here...

Has the DB been restored from an older version?

I'm almost 100% sure that I removed the suspected NonFree pertaining
to bug 00099 and 00109 (Artistic License)... It seems that they've
re-appeared. I tend to pair my wiki edits with post to the mailing
list...

Anyway, I've re-removed cracklib2 (since the Original Artistic License
has been approved by gNS), libfont-ttf-perl and... another perl
thing... (How specific!)

-Kevin

On 9/25/07, Chris Andrew <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I've just been having a look at the suspected non-free software table
> (http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Main/SuspectedNonFree), and the bugs list.
>
> It seems like quite a bit has changed since people made the really
> valuable contributions on these pages.
>
> Could everybody concerned please have a look at the following bugs,
> and having considered the current position, make any changes to the
> suspected non-free table.
>
> BUG 99 closed
>         102 closed
>         103 open
>         106 closed
>         108 open
>         109 duplicate of (closed) 99
>
> If a package was suspected non-free, a bug raised, then the issue
> resolved, then we need to delete the entry from the SNF table.
>
> If everyone can take a look at this, it will really advance things.
> Many thanks.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris.
>
> --
> Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux:
>
> http://www.getgnulinux.org/
>
> A great GNU/Linux distro:
>
> http://wiki.gnewsense.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gNewSense-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
>