[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses
From: |
Romel Sandoval |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:27:45 -0500 |
El jue, 19-04-2007 a las 14:46 -0400, Kevin Dean escribió:
> gNewSense focuses more on the FSF definition of Freedom
> (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) to determine if content
> (code, artwork or documentation) is Free.
Then GPL-Incompatible Free Software Licenses must be accepted since they
are free software according to
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
>
> For instance, there are binary blobs in the Linux kernel that is
> licensed under the GPL, you can't reasonably modify these blobs, so it
> violates freedoms 1 and 3 are violated, so gNewSense doesn't ship
> them.
>
> The GFDL is a GPL incompatible license but gNewSense uses it without
> the invariant sections, making the content itself Free.
>
> Hope that helped clear some things up.
>
> On 4/19/07, Romel Sandoval <address@hidden> wrote:
> > In the web page "Various Licenses and Comments about Them" [1] of FSF.
> > They classify a license according to certain key questions:
> >
> > * Whether it qualifies as a free software license.
> > * Whether it is a copyleft license.
> > * Whether it is compatible with the GNU GPL. (This means you can
> > combine a module which was released under that license with a
> > GPL-covered module to make one larger program.)
> > * Whether it causes any particular practical problems.
> >
> > My cuestion goes around two of these classifications:
> >
> > * GPL-Compatible Free Software Licenses
> > * GPL-Incompatible Free Software Licenses
> >
> > gNewSense accept both or just GPL-Compatible licenses. My doubt arise
> > since both are say to be Free Software.
> >
> > [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gNewSense-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gNewSense-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
- [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Romel Sandoval, 2007/04/19
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Kevin Dean, 2007/04/19
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses,
Romel Sandoval <=
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/04/19
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Kevin Dean, 2007/04/20
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/04/20
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Kevin Dean, 2007/04/20
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Paul O'Malley, 2007/04/20
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Karl Goetz, 2007/04/22
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, MJ Ray, 2007/04/21
- Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell, 2007/04/21
Re: [gNewSense-users] gNS accepted licenses, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2007/04/19