Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: free is not sufficient

[Jorge Rodríquez]

El mié, 15-11-2006 a las 10:03 +0100, Andreas K. Foerster wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 15. Nov 2006 schrieb Jorge Rodríquez:
> 
> > Whitch is the target user of gsn? the normal user of ???linux??? will not
> > use gns. 
> > 
> > The philosophy of gns is radical, is not ???open source???, is for radical
> > users (like I)
> 
> Well, I see gNewSense not as a system to use myself, but as a means to
> promote Free Software, by giving it to others. (hint: Christmas comming)
> 
> So, for me wine is less a problem than firefox.
> 
> Firefox is actively promoting unfree extensions and plugins, while wine
> and ndiswrapper just *offer* more possibilities, more capabilities.
> Offering more possibilities makes Free Software look good, promoting
> unfree software makes Free Software look bad.

In this question, I am not neutral, I am pro-GNU, I want one distro
activist. Is gns for my?

I see gNewSense not (only) as a system to use myself, but (also) as a
means to  promote (GeNUine) Free Software, by giving (example).

For my, the principles are more importants that the functionality. I
want that gns is a MORAL REFERENCE.


A happy user of gns.