|
From: | Andrew Cagney |
Subject: | Re: [Gdbheads] Re: Feb's patch resolution rate |
Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:53:05 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 |
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:13:31 -0500 From: Bob Rossi <address@hidden> Is quick linear with the size of the patch? Defenitely not.
As a simple example, a new architecture takes relatively little time to review:
- did it get put through gdb_indent.sh (coding ok) - did it get put through gdb_ari.sh (interfaces ok) - anthing obviously garish - can it break core-GDB (no) - is there an assignmentContrast that to a single addition to the architecture vector. Too often the mechanism overlaps existing functionality and hence requires changes far wider than the apparent one line addition.
The symbol table is identical. Andrew
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |