[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EmacsConf planning decisions: two or three tracks? honorifics in tal
From: |
jc@tlo |
Subject: |
Re: EmacsConf planning decisions: two or three tracks? honorifics in talk intro? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2023 07:59:33 +0900 |
> On Sep 28, 2023, at 0:22, Sacha Chua <sacha@sachachua.com> wrote:
>
> Hello, folks!
>
> Would anyone like to weigh in on the following decisions?
>
> https://emacsconf.org/2023/organizers-notebook/#three-tracks
> by 2023-10-13
>
> Three-track advantages:
> More space between talks for streaming the Q&A
> Easier to explain the schedule
> More logical grouping
> Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe
> Three-track disadvantages:
> Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad)
> Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node
> for VNC+OBS)
> More fear of missing out for participants
What's best for "us" in your opinion ?
How many volunteers do we need ?
Participants can always catch up with the videos,
> https://emacsconf.org/2023/organizers-notebook/#honorifics
> by 2023-11-14
>
> TODO Do we want to use honorifics like Dr.? :decision:
>
> OPTION: Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in
> the speaker-submitted intros:
> Equality
> OPTION: Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their
> intro:
> Observes personal preferences
I like this one. We can also say that we prefer not to use honorifics (it's not
an academic conference) but we respect people's preferences.
JC
> OPTION: Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros:
> Recognizes credentials
>
> Sacha
>
--
Jean-Christophe Helary @jchelary@emacs.ch
https://traductaire-libre.org
https://mac4translators.blogspot.com
https://sr.ht/~brandelune/omegat-as-a-book/