[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
EmacsConf planning decisions: two or three tracks? honorifics in talk in
From: |
Sacha Chua |
Subject: |
EmacsConf planning decisions: two or three tracks? honorifics in talk intro? |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:22:15 -0400 |
Hello, folks!
Would anyone like to weigh in on the following decisions?
https://emacsconf.org/2023/organizers-notebook/#three-tracks
by 2023-10-13
Three-track advantages:
More space between talks for streaming the Q&A
Easier to explain the schedule
More logical grouping
Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe
Three-track disadvantages:
Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad)
Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node
for VNC+OBS)
More fear of missing out for participants
https://emacsconf.org/2023/organizers-notebook/#honorifics
by 2023-11-14
TODO Do we want to use honorifics like Dr.? :decision:
OPTION: Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in
the speaker-submitted intros:
Equality
OPTION: Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their
intro:
Observes personal preferences
OPTION: Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros:
Recognizes credentials
Sacha
- EmacsConf planning decisions: two or three tracks? honorifics in talk intro?,
Sacha Chua <=