emacsconf-org
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

EmacsConf planning decisions: two or three tracks? honorifics in talk in


From: Sacha Chua
Subject: EmacsConf planning decisions: two or three tracks? honorifics in talk intro?
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:22:15 -0400

Hello, folks!

Would anyone like to weigh in on the following decisions?

https://emacsconf.org/2023/organizers-notebook/#three-tracks
by 2023-10-13

    Three-track advantages:
        More space between talks for streaming the Q&A
        Easier to explain the schedule
        More logical grouping
        Ends earlier, which is easier for participants from Europe
    Three-track disadvantages:
        Needs more volunteers (host, IRC, pad)
        Needs more computing power (will probably need to spin up another node 
for VNC+OBS)
        More fear of missing out for participants

https://emacsconf.org/2023/organizers-notebook/#honorifics
by 2023-11-14

TODO Do we want to use honorifics like Dr.? :decision:

    OPTION: Consistently using names without honorifics, even if indicated in 
the speaker-submitted intros:
        Equality
    OPTION: Asking speakers if they want us to use any honorifics in their 
intro:
        Observes personal preferences
    OPTION: Using honorifics based on e-mail signatures and intros:
        Recognizes credentials

Sacha



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]