Re: [PATCH v3.1] Re: [PATCH] add a function to only refresh inline images under current headline instead of global buffer

[Ihor Radchenko]

"Christopher M. Miles" <numbchild@gmail.com> writes:

>> I think that instead of changing the existing function, we can convert
>> your patch into a new function `org-toggle-inline-images-command' that
>> will be free to alter the argument order. We can then re-bind that
>> function in org-keys to make it used by default, but only interactively.
>>
> I don't think so, the patch main purpose is for improve image refreshing
> after babel result image displaying. Because the function is hooked by
> other ob-* packages. Another purpose is headline level images displaying.
> So modifying this function is the only way.

Fair point.
Then, for backward compatibility, we may treat any non-nil, non-list
(like '(4), '(16), '(64)), non-number (like 1, 11) value as
INCLUDE-LINKED. This way, the existing calls like
(org-toggle-inline-images t) will not be broken.

Also, the signature should be

(defun org-toggle-inline-images (&optional arg beg end include-linked)

So that the meaning of the second and third argument is unchanged.

>> As for displaying linked images, what about something like
>>
>>
>> C-1 C-c C-x C-v being equivalent of
>> C-c C-x C-v + INCLUDE-LINKED=t
>> (display in current section/region, with linked)
>>
>> and
>>
>> C-11 C-c C-x C-v being equivalent of
>> C-u C-u C-c C-x C-v + INCLUDE-LINKED=t
>> (display in the whole buffer, with linked)
>>
> Don't know, I have not use it this way. I think INCLUDE-LINKED is just a
> option argument for function org-display-inline-images. No need to be
> available for toggle in interactive command. An option like
> org-inline-images-include-linked is enough.

Sorry, but ignoring backwards compatibility is not an option.
If you personally haven't used some feature, it does not mean that
others also didn't.

We can make limited compromises, but should try our best not to break
things that were working before.
See https://bzg.fr/en/the-software-maintainers-pledge/

>>> +If cursor is on an inline image link, display the inline image.
>>> +If there is none, remove it otherwise.
>>
>> I do not quite understand what the last line is trying to say.
>
> Emmm, I forget the meaning of it. I read the docstring again, seems it
> can be deleted. I will delete it in my patch.

> After yesterday night studying source code, I still can't figure out
> solution. So I pass this patch to you. Wait you to finish the unfinished
> part of path.

I hope that now you have enough information to update the patch.
Let me know if not.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>