[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Key bindings for Org export back-ends?
From: |
Jens Lechtenboerger |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Key bindings for Org export back-ends? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 15:02:56 +0100 |
On 2019-02-08, at 06:51, Kaushal Modi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 3:28 AM Jens Lechtenboerger <address@hidden
> wrote:
>
>> - org-reveal [3]: R
>> - org-re-reveal [4]: r (conflict with RSS)
>
> I see that org-re-reveal is based off org-reveal. So do you see a use case
> where people would `require' both org-reveal and org-re-reveal? If not,
> then using the same binding as that of org-reveal should be fine too.
I don’t recommend that but org-re-reveal should allow for a parallel
installation. Therefore, I would like to bind a different key.
> I'm pretty sure there are many more Org backends out there. For example, I
> have a little ox-minutes backend that uses the M binding (and overrides the
> binding for ox-man, but that's fine for me as I don't use ox-man).
>
> We can start collecting a list of all Org backends on the Worg wiki. That's
> a good idea.
OK, let’s see whether additional input arrives.
> But doing so in order to not override the binding of some
> other backend might not be possible.
Fair enough. At least some guidance will be given.
>> Or C-r? So far, no back-end uses the
>> control key. Any reasons not to do this?
>>
>
> You could probably use C-<letter>, but one has to ensure that it doesn't
> override the inbuilt bindings like C-s (C-c C-e C-s ..). Also, not sure if
> that override would actually be effective.
On my machine using "?\C-r" instead of "?r" as letter works,
(resulting in integer number 18 in org-export-registered-backends).
However, the Org Export Dispatcher shows "[^R]" as key, which is not
ideal.
Best wishes
Jens