|
| From: | Richard Hansen |
| Subject: | Re: [O] [PATCH v3] fix SETUPFILE pathname expansion with subdirectories |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:55:14 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
On 2015-09-24 04:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Applied. Thank you.
Thank you!
>
> Would it make sense to do the same for INCLUDE? If so, would you want to
> have a look at it?
A chain of #+INCLUDEs already works OK. I'll send a patch that tweaks
the test-org-export/expand-include test case to ensure that it continues
to work.
The intended meanings of #+INCLUDE and #+SETUPFILE have never been clear
to me, so I have a couple of questions:
* What is supposed to happen if you have a #+SETUPFILE that has
an #+INCLUDE?
* What is supposed to happen if you have an #+INCLUDE file that
has a #+SETUPFILE line?
-Richard
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |