[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] "Generic" Source block language specification?
From: |
Eric Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: [O] "Generic" Source block language specification? |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:40:26 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:
> On 23/11/12 16:02, Eric Schulte wrote:
>> Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On 23/11/12 00:17, Eric Schulte wrote:
>>>> Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I have in a document a definition of a projection, which is essentially a
>>>>> text as
>>>>> follow:
>>>>>
>>>>> #+BEGIN_src +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29 +lon_0=30.75
>>>>> +x_0=0 +y_0=0
>>>>> +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+END_src
>>>>>
>>>>> Now this does obviously not export, as the source block language is
>>>>> missing. Is there a
>>>>> way that I can get the same formating of the source in the exportes
>>>>> output but without
>>>>> the syntax highlighting?
>>>>>
>>>>> BEGIN_EXAMPLE END_EXAMPLE
>>>>>
>>>>> is similar, but I would like the block to be formated as the SRC blocks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I bet "fundamental" would work, e.g.,
>>>
>>> Yes, it does - works perfectly. Is this documented?
>>>
>>
>> Yes. Whatever language string is placed at the top of the source block will
>> define the mode
>> used for export and in-block editing. I believe that is documented.
>
> OK - then I thought that I can use all languages *for formating* which are
> defined in the listings
> package in LaTeX, but it doesn't matter what I take: it always formats it in
> as a source block but
> obviously without syntax highlighting.
>
> For editing: C-c ' only works ehen using "fundamental" - other non-existent
> languages are not
> accepted (obviously).
>
> So I assume in org, there is support for "fundamental", but I could not find
> it in the
> documentation when I looked.
>
When editing a code block, Org-mode will take the name of the language,
append "-mode", and then try to call the result as a function. So for
example, an R code block will call "R-mode" to edit the contents using
R-mode. Thus any *-mode is a valid code block name.
>
> At the moment, my org info documentation seems to be not accessible
>(blank page when opening it).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rainer
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Rainer
>>>
>>>>
>>>> #+begin_src fundamental +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29
>>>> +lon_0=30.75 +x_0=0
>>>> +y_0=0 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+end_src
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rainer
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
Re: [O] "Generic" Source block language specification?, Jambunathan K, 2012/11/23
Re: [O] "Generic" Source block language specification?, Rainer M Krug, 2012/11/25