[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:48:09 +0100 |
Toby Cubitt <address@hidden> writes:
> Here's an updated patch. Now both org-time-clocksum-format and
> org-time-clocksum-fractional-format can be plists, as discussed.
That was quick. Thank you.
> In the org-time-clocksum-format case, I made the values cons cells which
> specify both a format string and a boolean. The latter indicates whether
> the time component should always be included in the formatted duration,
> even if its value is 0. This is needed for the hours component to
> reproduce the current default format, and I figured I might as well make
> it general.
I understand. It is a necessary evil. Though, instead of asking for cons
cells, maybe the boolean could be provided as another property. I.e.
'(:hour "..." :persistent-hour t)
would be a replacement for:
'(:hour ("..." . t))
And, better,
'(:hour "...")
would the become a replacement for
'(:hour ("..." . nil))
What do you think about it? The name of the property is only
a suggestion.
> I used a somewhat complex customization type in the defcustoms, instead
> of a straight plist, in order to produce a better ui for the
> customization interface. I'm still not completely satisfied with it.
> E.g. it would be nice to get rid of the "Cons cell" tag entirely, and use
> a checkbox for the boolean. But I can't figure out how to do that
> (without defining new customization types/widgets, which I don't have the
> patience for).
The advantage of the method above it that it would /de facto/ get rid of
the "Cons cell" tag.
> + (org-add-props (concat (format "%s " (make-string l ?*))
> + (org-minutes-to-clocksum-string
> time)
> + (format "%s" (make-string (- 16 l)
> ?\ )))
You forgot to change that.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, (continued)
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/06
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/11/07
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/08
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/11/09
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/13
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/11/14
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/14
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/11/14
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/14
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/16
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/17
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/11/17
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/17
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Mike McLean, 2012/11/20
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/20
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/11/20
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Mike McLean, 2012/11/21
- [O] [bug] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Sebastien Vauban, 2012/11/30
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Achim Gratz, 2012/11/06
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Separate clocksum format for durations >= 1 day, Toby Cubitt, 2012/11/06