[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound
From: |
Christopher Schmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:18:39 +0000 (GMT) |
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> In any case, if you can get rid of the let-bind (or the need to muck
> with TeX-master at all within org), without introducing a regression,
> we are all ears.
I think adding (require 'tex nil t) before the let form is a nice fix.
IMO the situation ATM is pretty bad. If AUCTeX is not loaded pre export
the missing variable definition breaks AUCTeX completely.
Christopher
- [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Christopher Schmidt, 2012/10/25
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/25
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Christopher Schmidt, 2012/10/25
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/26
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Christopher Schmidt, 2012/10/26
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Christopher Witte, 2012/10/26
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/26
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Christopher Schmidt, 2012/10/26
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Nick Dokos, 2012/10/26
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound,
Christopher Schmidt <=
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Nick Dokos, 2012/10/29
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Christopher Schmidt, 2012/10/29
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Nick Dokos, 2012/10/29
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Christopher Schmidt, 2012/10/30
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Nick Dokos, 2012/10/30
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Christopher Schmidt, 2012/10/30
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Sebastien Vauban, 2012/10/30
- Re: [O] TeX-master: TeX-master is let-bound, Nick Dokos, 2012/10/30