emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] =<<<...>>>= invalid


From: Jorge Timón
Subject: Re: [O] =<<<...>>>= invalid
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:27:09 +0200

I still get \texttt{<<<} \ldots{} \texttt{>>>}

I have Org-mode version 6.33x at work. I'll check later at home, where
I have both emacs23 and emacs24 (snapshot).

On 9/17/12, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
>       Jorge Timón <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't care about the spaces and I would prefer not to use latex.
>> The problem is that that produces:
>>
>> \texttt{<<<} \ldots{} \texttt{>>>}
>>
>
> Did you try it with the tildes instead of the equal signs?
> Here, both old and new exporters produce
>
> aaa \verb~<<<~ \ldots{} \verb~>>>~ aa a a
>
> at least with the version I'm running (Org-mode version 7.9.1
> (release_7.9.1-214-gf025d1))
>
> Nick
>
>> and then latex joins the first << and the first >> together, which is
>> really ugly.
>>
>> My document is already LaTeX specific, but if I'm able replace more
>> latex with org mode, I should consider a later edition of the tex
>> produced to keep it backend-independent. Not critical for this
>> document, but it is always cool to be able to export to different
>> formats.
>>
>> Thank you for the suggestion, anyway.
>>
>> On 9/17/12, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >    Jorge Timón <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The only way I know to do what I want is \verb=<<<=...\verb=>>>=, in
>> >> case someone has a similar problem.
>> >>
>> >
>> > If you don't mind the extra space around the dots, you can say
>> >
>> >    aaa ~<<<~ ... ~>>>~ aa a a
>> >
>> > the advantage being that it is backend-independent, so it will export
>> > correctly to HTML and presumably all the other backends --- at least
>> > with the new exporter: I didn't try the old one.
>> >
>> > There are ways to deal with the spaces as well (the one before the dots
>> > is no problem: it's the one after that causes a problem in this case),
>> > but imo they are not worth the bother unless you really, really need
>> > that
>> > exact behavior. I'd rather live with the spaces (or edit the resulting
>> > latex
>> > file, but that has disadvantages of its own).
>> >
>> > Nick
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jorge Timón
>>
>


-- 
Jorge Timón



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]