Re: [O] Use nomencl package with latex exporter?

[Andrew Young]

Hello Johan,

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Johan Ekh <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thanks,
> can you give some hints on how to customize it, or point me to some
> information?

To have makeindex run, try evaluating the following elisp:

(setq org-latex-to-pdf-process
        '("pdflatex -interaction nonstopmode %b"
          "bibtex %b"
          "makeindex %b.nlo -s nomencl.ist -o %b.nls"
          "pdflatex -interaction nonstopmode %b"
          "pdflatex -interaction nonstopmode %b"))

Alternatively, you can customize the variable org-latex-to-pdf-process
as Nick suggests, to accomplish the same thing. Use the following
command:

M-x customize-variable org-latex-to-pdf-process

More documentation is available through customize, and there is lots
of great information available here:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-latex-export.html

Hope this helps,

Andrew


>
> /Johan
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Johan Ekh <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> > Thank you Myles,
>> > I'm not that comfortable with cmake but I will give your solution a try
>> > and report My milage.
>> >
>> > / Johan
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPad
>> >
>> > On 6 aug 2012, at 14:14, Myles English <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Johan Ekh writes:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi all,
>> > >> I use the default latex exporter in org-mode v7.8 to write documents
>> > >> using
>> > >> a custom latex class which is built on "article".
>> > >> I would like to use the "nomencl" latex package if possible.
>> > >
>> > >> From the shell I usually run something like
>> > >>
>> > >> makeindex filename.nlo -s nomencl.ist -o filename.nls
>> > >>
>> > >> followed by latex or pdflatex, but how can I get the exporter to do
>> > >> this?
>>
>> Customize the variable org-latex-to-pdf-process appropriately.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> > > I don't know the answer to your question, but when I came across the
>> > > same problem, I used a makefile-like solution because I felt that the
>> > > building process was becoming sufficiently complicated to warrant
>> > > using
>> > > a specialised tool.  If you are comfortable with CMake already it may
>> > > be
>> > > worth a look.  Have a look for "UseLatex.cmake".
>> > >
>> > > Basically you get emacs to export the .tex file from the .org file:
>> > >
>> > > add_custom_command(
>> > >  OUTPUT ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/mypaper.tex
>> > >  COMMAND emacs --batch
>> > >    --visit=${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/mypaper.org
>> > >    --load=/home/me/myfuncs.el
>> > >    --funcall org-export-as-latex-batch
>> > >  DEPENDS orgfile
>> > >  COMMENT "Exporting orgmode file to LaTeX using emacs"
>> > >  )
>> > >
>> > > And then bibtex and nomenclature are asked to do their stuff, and a
>> > > pdf
>> > > is produced, with something like this directive:
>> > >
>> > > add_latex_document( mypaper.tex
>> > >  INPUTS tex/bibliography.tex
>> > >         texlib/mystyle.sty
>> > >  BIBFILES texlib/mylibrary.bib
>> > >  DEFAULT_PDF
>> > >  USE_NOMENCL
>> > > )
>> > >
>> > > I also get it to generate all my R plots.  Other advantages are that
>> > > you
>> > > get an out-of-source build that is isolated (to some extent) in its
>> > > own
>> > > directory.  And I think it is easier to diagnose the problems when
>> > > things go wrong, better than staring at an elisp backtrace.  Now if
>> > > org
>> > > would write my CMakeList.txt for me, that would be a fine thing.
>> > >
>> > > Myles
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>